Antonio Burton here. Fifteen years of Azeroth raids, markets, and guild arguments. My own guild pushes back.
No fluff. I review carry services and log the results publicly. Corrections happen in the open.
Where the work sits
New readers start at the verdicts page. Questions go to the contact page. The project background is on the about page.
What I dont cover
Gold-selling pitches and piloted-account offers never get a response. This site reviews gameplay services, not purchases.
How the method started
A winter raid taught me more than any guide. Forty players held one bridge for three hours straight. My side lost every pull. I logged every wipe and found the pattern by spring.
That pattern became the first review. Since then every verdict follows the same rule: results first, numbers second, ego last.
One service per page
One review per page, no mixing. Carries dont share space with gold offers. That order saves readers more time than any index.
Why one reviewer
Panels slow reviews and editors soften them. One voice stays sharp.
What stays outside
Guild drama, transfer rumors, and bench gossip. The review pages hold service assessments, never whispers.
The first review
A disputed loot call years back needed a decision. Both sides stated their case. Numbers favored one side clearly. I ruled before midnight and the method stuck.
What readers send most
Screenshots with timestamps lead every week, with vault complaints close behind. Thank-you notes arrive rarely and get saved.
